The best mole repellers, compared.
Top pick: NAKAICUN MY4 pack Best value: PCXWTLN PC-OS-01 4-pack – Lowest four-pack price in the set, about £14.99, with 3.7 from 84 reviews and fault reports in the file. Updated October 2026.
A mole repeller is a garden stake that vibrates, beeps, or both. It is sold to shift a European mole off a lawn. On amazon.co.uk the usual complaint is molehills, not a pest that eats the plants. The Royal Horticultural Society says moles feed on soil invertebrates, and that an electronic device may only move the mole to another part of the garden. Quality, for a shopper, is a listing whose power source, pack count and sound claim agree, plus a review line you can read. A coverage number in a bullet is not that check. The Standards has not accepted efficacy claims for this class of device. It does not promise that a stake clears moles. If the hills are the problem and a gadget may not be the answer, start with [moles in a British lawn](/hub/pest-control/blog/moles-in-a-british-lawn). UK shoppers on amazon.co.uk are mostly dealing with molehills. Moles feed on soil invertebrates and they do not eat grass.
A mole repeller is a garden stake that vibrates, beeps, or both. It is sold to shift a European mole off a lawn. On amazon.co.uk the usual complaint is molehills, not a pest that eats the plants.
38 products checked · 56 hrs invested · +19,200 readers
Swipe for more
1-2 of 11
Personal buying guide
Question 1 of 2
Where will the stake sit?
This second NAKAICUN MY4 ASIN costs £19.99 and carries a 5.0-star line from 33 reviews. That headline is less decisive than it appears because only three captured texts are marked United Kingdom; most of the available comments come from France, Germany or Italy. The listing uses the same MY4 model number, 400 Hz wording and 650-square-metre claim as the much lower-rated NAKAICUN ASIN, yet the dimensions, UPC and star line differ. Its title implies four stakes while the unit count says one. The bullets say results may take two weeks or longer, which is seller guidance rather than a tested outcome. Treat this as a separate, lightly supported listing rather than proof that the shared MY4 design is the strongest option.
Pros
Cons
Best for: Buyers who accept limited UK evidence and verify the supplied quantity before ordering.
Less suitable: Anyone choosing mainly from the 5.0 headline or needing a clearly distinct model.
Specifications
Common questions
Are the 33 reviews from the UK?
The star line says 33. In the captured texts, three are marked United Kingdom. The rest are from France, Germany or Italy.
Is this the same listing as B0H2WBM5ZM?
Both say model MY4 and £19.99. Dimensions, UPC and the star line differ, so they stay as two ASINs.
How long does the bullet say it takes?
Two weeks or longer.
The NIUBDHQ AR08M-C is listed as four solar stakes for £25.99, with an IP65 claim and a three-second vibration and beep every 32 seconds. Its title and unit-count field both say four, avoiding the pack-count conflict found on several cheaper listings. The seller says five hours of sun provides about 38 hours of running and advises waiting two to four weeks, but neither statement is an independent test. A 5.0-star line based on three reviews is too small to establish reliability, and only two short UK texts are captured. The same part number appears under another ASIN with a different weight and different review texts. This is a reasonably coherent solar pack on paper, but its premium over the top pick is not backed by deeper evidence.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A sunny lawn where a clearly stated four-pack and IP65 claim justify the higher price.
Less suitable: Buyers who want substantial UK review depth or a uniquely identified listing.
Specifications
Common questions
How long do the bullets say to wait?
Two to four weeks, after at least two days of sun before first use.
How many reviews are behind the 5.0?
The listing line says 3. Two UK texts are in the file. Both are short and positive.
Is the panel described as waterproof?
The bullet claims IP65 and says to clean the panel. No test report is in the file.
This NIUBDHQ listing repeats the AR08M-C part number and £25.99 price, but records a weight of 520 g rather than 500 g. The unit count says four, while one of its three reviews calls the product a two-pack. Those three reviews produce a 5.0-star line and mention fewer tunnels after a couple of weeks, solar running and a screw-in head, but the sample is too small for a dependable result. The listing claims IP65 protection, a pulse every 32 seconds and coverage up to 460 square metres. None of those seller claims resolves whether this is materially different from the other AR08M-C ASIN. Verify the variant and pack quantity before treating it as the same four-pack.
Pros
Cons
Best for: Buyers prepared to verify the exact AR08M-C variant and supplied quantity.
Less suitable: Anyone needing an unambiguous four-pack or meaningful review depth.
Specifications
Common questions
How is this different from B0HFJD41KM?
Same part number, price and bullet set. This file weighs 520 g, ranks lower in Mole Control, and has three different UK review texts.
Did a reviewer confirm four stakes?
One text calls it a 2-pack and praises a screw-in head. The title and unit count say 4.
What did reviewers praise?
Fewer tunnels after a couple of weeks, a screw-in head, and solar running. There is no criticism in the three texts.
The BOJYS Umr-001-4BX is advertised as a £17.79 solar four-pack with an IP66 claim and a pulse every 20 seconds. Its only UK review gives five stars and says the moles disappeared within 24 hours, but one anecdote cannot establish a repeatable result. Several listing fields also undermine the headline: pieces and unit count say one, while the dimensions are only 6 × 3 × 1 cm and the recorded weight is 100 g. The maximum-range attribute says 450 metres, whereas a bullet says a 15-metre radius and up to 650 square metres. Those differences are too large to reconcile as normal rounding. The attractive price therefore comes with more specification risk than the better-supported packs.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A speculative low-cost purchase only after confirming the quantity and dimensions.
Less suitable: Buyers who need dependable specifications or meaningful review evidence.
Specifications
Common questions
How many units are in the attribute table?
Number of pieces is 1 and the unit count is 1. The title says a 4-pack. Dimensions are 6 x 3 x 1 cm and the weight is 100 g.
Which range figure is in the file?
The maximum-range attribute says 450 metres. A bullet says about 15 metres radius and up to 650 square metres.
How many reviews support the 5.0?
One UK text. It says moles were gone within 24 hours.
The Nitoer S40L is presented as four solar stakes for about £20, with a pulse of three to four seconds every 30 seconds. Its 4.2-star line comes from 22 reviews, which is a more useful signal than the near-perfect ratings supported by only one to three reviews elsewhere in this comparison. The listing claims IP65 protection and gives broadly matching placement figures of 15.24 metres and 50 feet. However, the power-source attribute says ac_dc while the bullets describe solar charging, and the unit-count field says one although the title and pieces field say four. One review also says a dog reacted to the sound, so poison-free wording should not be read as inaudible to pets. It is our top pick on the available listing evidence, not proof that it will clear a lawn.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A sunny small lawn where you want a four-stake pack and accept the listing conflicts.
Less suitable: Shaded ground, sound-sensitive pets, or buyers who need every specification to agree.
Specifications
Common questions
Does the listing say solar or mains?
The bullets and the style name say solar, with two days of sun before first use. The power-source attribute says ac_dc. Both are in the file.
How many stakes does the file record?
The title and the pieces field say 4. The unit count says 1.
What do the UK reviews say about pets?
Bullets say there is no poison. One review says a dog growled at the sound.
The PCXWTLN PC-OS-01 offers a four-pack title for £14.99, the lowest multi-pack price in this set. Its 3.7-star line is based on 84 reviews, giving it more review depth than most of the newer solar packs. The listing says it pulses every 40 seconds and claims coverage up to 650 square metres, but that remains seller wording rather than a measured result. More than one UK review reports that only three of four units worked, and a failed unit could not take a replacement battery. The material field says wood and there is no numbered IP rating, despite general weatherproof wording. It is the best-value option if a low-cost four-pack matters more than specification clarity or replaceable power.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A budget trial on an open, sunny lawn where four claimed stakes matter.
Less suitable: Buyers wanting replaceable batteries, a stated IP code or consistently reliable units.
Specifications
Common questions
Are batteries required?
The bullets say the stake charges from the sun. Reviews say a failed unit could not take a replacement battery.
Is an IP code printed?
No. The bullets say the housing copes with rain and snow. There is no IP numeral in the technical details.
What do reviewers report about faults?
More than one UK review says only three of four units worked, and one unit stopped with no way to change the cell.
This NIKAND four-pack has the largest review count in the set, with a 3.3-star line from 3,528 reviews, but it is also the most expensive at £39.95. The listing describes solar stakes pulsing for three to four seconds every 30 seconds and suggests spacing them every 96 feet. Captured UK reviews are sharply mixed: some report movement after days or weeks, while many mention hills beside an active stake, an intrusive beep, water ingress or units stopping. The title uses waterproof wording but gives no numbered IP code. Its target attribute says mouse even though the bullets name moles and other burrowing animals. The large evidence pool exposes recurring limitations rather than supporting a premium recommendation.
Pros
Cons
Best for: Buyers who value a large volume of mixed feedback and accept the premium price.
Less suitable: Anyone expecting the higher price to buy proven clearance or stronger weather evidence.
Specifications
Common questions
What do the first UK reviews argue about?
Some say moles moved after days or weeks. Many say hills appeared beside the stake, the beep is constant, or units let in water and then stopped.
Is there an IP code?
No numeral. The bullets say waterproof and corrosion-proof. Reviews describe water and condensation.
What species is in the attribute?
Mouse. The bullets name moles, voles, shrews and gophers.
The NIKAND R_4 is a £33.96 four-pack with a 3.3-star line from 3,092 reviews. Its title says solar powered, yet the attribute table leaves the power source blank and marks the product as not electric. No pulse interval, coverage figure or IP code is recorded in the display fields, so comparison relies heavily on the title and review pool. UK reviews report units failing after days or around four months, neighbours noticing the sound, and fresh hills appearing beside stakes that were still beeping. The large sample is more informative than a 5.0 based on one or three comments, but it is not especially reassuring. This separate R_4 listing costs less than the other NIKAND pack, though still more than the comparison's better-scoring options.
Pros
Cons
Best for: Buyers who prefer extensive mixed feedback over sparse five-star listings.
Less suitable: Anyone wanting clear technical fields, quiet operation or evidence matching the premium price.
Specifications
Common questions
Is power stated in the attributes?
No power-source line. The title says solar powered. The is-electric field says no.
What failed in the UK reviews?
Texts report units dead after days or about four months, noise neighbours noticed, and hills next to stakes that were still beeping.
Is this the same pack as B0832T8KD8?
No. Different model, price, dimensions and review file. Both show 3.3 and a very large count.
The Defenders STV645 is the only clearly battery-powered stake in this comparison, making it the practical power choice for shade or weak winter light. It takes two 1.5 V D cells, which are not supplied, and the listing describes a five-second vibration every 55 seconds. Its IP44 claim and visible cap are useful buying details, while the £16.94 shelf price does not include the ongoing cost of batteries. The 3.0-star line from 697 reviews is shared with the solar STV757 and includes comments about both solar failure and D cells, so it is not a clean model-specific score. The listing also gives both 1,000 square metres and a 31.62-metre range without explaining the relationship. It is a conditional choice for shaded ground, not evidence that battery power repels moles more effectively.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A shaded garden or winter use where dependable charging matters more than running cost.
Less suitable: Buyers wanting batteries included, a multi-pack or a model-specific review score.
Specifications
Common questions
Are batteries in the box?
No. The bullet says two 1.5 V D batteries, and they are not included.
Which species does the attribute name?
Mole. The solar sibling’s attribute says mouse.
How should the 697 reviews be read?
They are the same block as the solar STV757 file, including texts about solar failure and D cells. It is one shared pool.
The Defenders STV757 is a single solar stake at £11.79 with a visible orange cap and an IP44 claim. Its listing describes a rechargeable 1.5 V pack and a pulse every 30 seconds, so there are no separate D cells to buy. The displayed 3.0-star line from 697 reviews cannot be treated as evidence for this model alone because the same pool and review texts appear on the battery-powered STV645. Retailer descriptions also disagree over pulse timing and coverage. IP44 indicates a splash-resistance claim, not that water ingress is impossible. Choose it only as a low-cost solar single stake where the panel can charge, not because the large review count proves this model's performance.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A sunny position where you want one inexpensive, visible solar stake.
Less suitable: Shade, winter charging constraints, or buyers relying on model-specific reviews.
Specifications
Common questions
Does this stake need D batteries?
The bullet describes a solar rechargeable 1.5 V pack. D cells are the battery model STV645, not this ASIN.
Is the 697-review line only for this solar stake?
No. The same 3.0 from 697 line and the same review texts are in the STV645 file. Do not add the two counts.
What weather mark is printed?
IP44. That is a splash claim under IEC 60529, not a hose-jet or immersion mark.
This NAKAICUN MY4 listing presents a solar four-pack at £19.99 and says it emits 400 Hz every 30 seconds. A 400 Hz tone is audible rather than ultrasonic, despite the wording used in the bullets. The 2.4-star line is based on six UK reviews, four of which say digging continued or increased and two of which report the mole leaving the treated area. That split is too small for an efficacy conclusion, but it is a clear caution against trusting the coverage claim of 650 square metres. The title says four while the unit count says one, and no numbered IP rating is shown. Its evidence and listing consistency are weaker than the similarly priced alternatives.
Pros
Cons
Best for: Only buyers comfortable treating a low-rated, audible solar pack as an experiment.
Less suitable: Sound-sensitive gardens or anyone expecting consistent UK review support.
Specifications
Common questions
Is 400 Hz ultrasonic?
The bullet uses both words. 400 Hz is an audible tone. The file does not show a frequency above 20 kHz.
What did the six UK reviews say?
Four texts say the mole kept digging or dug more. Two say the mole left the area where the stake was placed.
Does it need spare batteries?
The bullet says the panel charges it and no extra batteries are required.
The editorial score is a 0–100 comparison of the amazon.co.uk listing evidence for these 11 stakes. It is not a laboratory score and it does not measure whether a product clears moles. Scores are reduced for a shared review pool, a very small sample, predominantly non-UK comments, recurring fault reports, missing or conflicting power fields, disputed pack counts and range claims that do not reconcile. A perfect star average from one to three reviews is capped. The highest evidence score is the top pick. The strongest low-price option is best value. The weights below sum to 100.
Amazon star line and review depth
35%The published star line and how many reviews sit behind it. A large mixed file counts for more than a 5.0 from one to three reviews.
Price and pack value
20%Shelf price in this set, in GBP, read against whether the title is a single stake or a multi-pack.
Listing consistency
20%Whether model, power source, quantity and dimensions agree across the title, the attribute table and the bullets.
Stated equipment and weather mark
15%Whether the listing states the power arrangement and a weather-resistance mark. An IP numeral is a seller claim, not a result.
UK review comments
10%Whether the captured comments are relevant and balanced, including shared pools and files that are mostly from outside the UK.
A useful mole repeller listing is one whose power, pack count and sound claim agree, with a review line you can interpret. Coverage numbers in the bullets do not settle the purchase. The notes below follow the recorded amazon.co.uk files and the public UK sources in the digest.
A mole repeller, in this category, is a garden stake that vibrates, beeps, or both. Sellers offer it to shift a European mole off a lawn. UK shoppers on amazon.co.uk are mostly dealing with molehills. Moles feed on soil invertebrates and they do not eat grass. The Royal Horticultural Society says an electronic device may only move the mole to another part of the garden, and that a small garden is often one animal outside the breeding season. Moles have no UK legal protection.
NAKAICUN bullets use both 400 Hz and the word ultrasonic. 400 Hz is an audible tone. Reviews across brands describe a beep that people and dogs notice. Safe-for-pets wording means no poison is listed.
Spacing and coverage claims in this set do not agree: about 15 metres, every 50 feet, every 96 feet, 460 m², 650 m², or 1,000 m². The BOJYS file also pairs a 15 metre bullet with a 450 metre attribute. Pick none of those as a measured result.
A panel that is buried so you can mow cannot charge, and a quiet panel is not a result. The digest also flags judging the stake overnight, and adding the Defenders STV645 and STV757 review lines. Those two files are one shared pool of 3.0 from 697.
The power source has to match the site. Solar stakes need sun. The Defenders STV645, about £16.94, takes two 1.5 V D batteries, and they are not included, which is why it is the shade and winter option. The Defenders STV757, about £11.79, is the solar stake from the same brand family, with a rechargeable pack described in the bullet. Most of the other titles are solar multi-packs. The Nitoer S40L is the awkward case: the bullets say solar, and the power attribute says ac_dc.
Sound words have to match the hertz figure. NAKAICUN bullets say 400 Hz and ultrasonic. 400 Hz is an audible tone, and the files do not show a frequency above 20 kHz. Reviews across brands describe a beep that people and dogs notice, including a Nitoer review in which a dog growled. A bullet that says safe for pets means no poison is listed. It does not mean the garden stays quiet. Waterproofing is a seller mark, not a result.
Three typical situations, each with a recommendation from this comparison.
You want a non-lethal try on an open lawn before you call a catcher, and you can live with a listing that does not agree with itself. The Nitoer S40L is the top pick: about £19.90, 4.2 from 22 reviews, a four-stake title and an IP65 claim. The power attribute says ac_dc while the bullets say solar.
A panel that does not charge goes quiet. The Defenders STV645 is the battery stake in this set: about £16.94, two 1.5 V D cells not included, and an IP44 claim. The 3.0 from 697 line is shared with the solar STV757, so it is not a clean score for this model alone.
You want the cheapest four-pack title in this comparison and you accept fault reports. The PCXWTLN PC-OS-01 is best value at about £14.99, with 3.7 from 84 reviews. UK reviews include packs where only three of four units worked, and there is no numbered IP code.
The top pick is PCXWTLN PC-OS-01 4-pack, with the highest score in this comparison (7.5 out of 10, from 84 amazon.co.uk reviews). The best value is the PCXWTLN PC-OS-01 4-pack at about £14.99, the lowest four-pack price here, with 3.7 from 84 reviews and reports of dead units. Neither score is a lab result, and neither listing is proof that a stake clears moles.
PCXWTLN PC-OS-01 4-pack
Lowest four-pack price in the set, about £14.99, with 3.7 from 84 reviews and fault reports in the file.
Editorial
Peter F. is the editor for DIY & tools at productscompared.co.uk. Comparisons in this category are checked against amazon.co.uk listings, review evidence and public UK sources.
Guides on what to look for, how to use a product, and common mistakes.
Public UK sources and the amazon.co.uk listings recorded for this comparison, mapped on 17 October 2026. Prices are those recorded shelf prices, not a live re-check.
This page contains affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Prices and review counts are from amazon.co.uk listings. We did not lab-test these stakes.
