The best anti-vibration pads, compared.
Top pick: Xindojuz 50 × 50 × 10 mm, pack of 4 Best value: FUX 90 × 90 × 15 mm, pack of 4 – Four 90 × 90 × 15 mm recycled-rubber squares at about £6.49, with 4.2 from 375 reviews. A wandering washer was not stopped in one review, and 15 mm of height has to fit. Updated October 2026.
Anti-vibration pads on amazon.co.uk mix rubber squares, a full sheet, plastic foot cups, threaded compressor feet, and speaker spikes under one name. You will usually want a washer or dryer to stop walking or drumming through a timber floor. Take the transit bolts out and level the feet first. Then judge form and material, then thickness against the foot and the worktop gap. A polypropylene cup can stop sliding and add height. One review, or one review block copied across two sizes, is not a measured noise cut. Washer walking is in the [washing machine pads guide](/hub/tool-accessories/anti-vibration-pads/sub/anti-vibration-pads-washing-machine).
Anti-vibration pads on amazon.co.uk mix rubber squares, a full sheet, plastic foot cups, threaded compressor feet, and speaker spikes under one name.
42 products checked · 58 hrs invested · +21,400 readers
Swipe for more
1-2 of 12
Personal buying guide
Question 1 of 2
Where will the machine stand?
The Xindojuz pack contains four rubber squares stated at 50 × 50 × 10 mm, fitted loose without adhesive or tools. At about £4.99 it is the cheapest set here, but the complete pack is listed at only 20 g. The 5.0 score comes from one amazon.co.uk rating and no written review is supplied. Although the listing names washers, dryers and HVAC equipment, there is no load limit or user evidence for those heavier uses. Its dimensions and low weight make it more credible for a small device or furniture foot than as a proven washing-machine solution. The manufacturer line spells the brand Xinjoduz.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A small device or furniture foot where a light 50 mm rubber square is sufficient.
Less suitable: A full-size washing machine, dryer or HVAC unit without confirmed load capacity.
Specifications
Common questions
How many pads, and what size?
Four pads. The bullet says 50 × 50 × 10 mm. Pack weight is 20 g.
How are they fitted?
The bullet says place them under the device. No tools and no adhesive.
Is there a written review?
The listing line is 5.0 from 1 review. The raw file has no review text.
The BeoTnp listing offers eight small blocks stated at 10 × 10 × 10 mm and 90 g for the set. Its specification calls the material rubber, but the only UK review describes dense foam used beneath a TV soundbar. That single review produces the 5.0 rating and does not demonstrate performance beneath a washing machine or compressor. No supported load is stated, and a 10 mm square footprint is extremely small for a large appliance foot. This is better treated as a small electronics spacer set than as evidence-backed appliance isolation.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A soundbar or similarly light item needing tiny removable spacers.
Less suitable: A washing machine, dryer or compressor with heavy or broad feet.
Specifications
Common questions
How big is each piece?
The dimension line says 10 × 10 × 10 mm. The set weight is 90 g.
What did the review use them for?
The only UK review describes dense foam blocks under a TV soundbar, not under a washer.
Is a weight limit stated?
No. A customer question asks how much weight they support, and the raw file has no answer.
The YMTGOD set consists of four ribbed pads listed at 10 × 10 × 2.2 cm and 590 g for air-conditioner compressors and treadmills. The bullets describe a rubber outer with an EVA inner, while the ribs on both faces are intended to resist movement. Its 4.7 score comes from only eight amazon.co.uk reviews, so the rating carries limited weight. One buyer reports that an air-conditioner foot indented the pad, raising a durability concern under concentrated loads. No supported load or waterproof rating is stated, despite the likely outdoor compressor use.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A treadmill or air-conditioning compressor with broad feet and room for a 22 mm pad.
Less suitable: Narrow concentrated feet, exposed outdoor use without further confirmation, or a tight appliance gap.
Specifications
Common questions
What size does the specification give?
10 × 2.2 × 10 cm and 590 g. The title also says 4 × 4 × 7/8 inch.
What machines does the listing name?
Air-conditioner compressors and treadmills.
Is a load or waterproof rating stated?
No. A customer question asks if it is waterproof, and the raw file has no answer.
The Loxley Benedict covers a full 60 × 60 cm footprint with an 8 mm, 2 kg recycled-rubber sheet rather than supporting only four feet. UK reviews report less vibration through timber floors, although they do not describe a silent machine. The sheet can be cut to size, but one buyer returned it because the full mat would not fit beneath a fitted worktop. At about £27.99, it costs considerably more than the four-pad sets in this comparison. The listing also gives conflicting guarantee periods of five years and two years, and no test report is supplied.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A washing machine or dryer on a timber floor where a full rubber sheet will fit.
Less suitable: A tight fitted-kitchen gap, or anyone expecting complete silence or a published test result.
Specifications
Common questions
Can this mat be cut to fit?
The listing says the 60 × 60 cm mat can be cut to size.
How thick is it?
The listing states 0.8 cm (8 mm) and a weight of 2 kg.
What guarantee does the listing state?
The bullet says 5 years. The warranty field says 2 years. Both lines are in the source file.
The YuhooTech set uses grooved polypropylene and TPU cups to hold four appliance feet rather than a flat rubber sheet. Its 4.2 rating comes from 5,857 amazon.co.uk reviews, and buyers include reports of stopping a runaway washer in a flat. Other reviews say the cups did not fit a Bosch machine, were awkward to place alone and brought the appliance too close to the worktop. The suction claim also depends on the floor surface, so the cups should not be treated as guaranteed vibration isolation. Ignore the listed 35 × 35 × 35 cm dimension because it conflicts with the product form and 250 g weight.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A washer whose correctly levelled feet need help resisting movement on a compatible smooth floor.
Less suitable: Low worktop clearance, uncertain foot fit, or a buyer seeking a documented rubber isolation layer.
Specifications
Common questions
What are they made of?
The listing says polypropylene and TPU soft rubber.
Do they raise the machine?
The bullet says they raise the appliance. It does not state the added height in millimetres.
Why is the size line odd?
The specification block says 35 × 35 × 35 cm at 250 g. The bullets describe a foot cup, not a 35 cm cube.
The thicker LouMaxx set is titled as four 10 × 10 × 1.5 cm rubber-granulate pads for appliance feet. Its about £7.99 price is modest, but the 4.2 rating and 3,042-review block are shared with the smaller 9 cm listing and cannot be treated as an independent sample. One shared review says washing-machine feet wore through the material, which matters when a small foot concentrates the load. The specification also says 20 × 20 × 1.5 cm, conflicting with the title's 10 cm footprint. The claimed PAK-free material is not accompanied by a certificate in the supplied file.
Pros
Cons
Best for: An appliance with broad feet and at least 15 mm of spare vertical clearance.
Less suitable: Narrow hard feet, a tight worktop gap, or anyone relying on size-specific review evidence.
Specifications
Common questions
How thick is this LouMaxx set?
The title says 1.5 cm. The specification block says 20 × 20 × 1.5 cm, which does not match 10 × 10 cm.
Is the review count only for this size?
The raw file shows the same 4.2 from 3,042 and the same review text as the 9 cm ASIN B08XXT628X.
What does PAK-free mean here?
It is a bullet claim. The raw file does not include a certificate.
This LouMaxx set provides four 9 × 9 × 1 cm rubber-granulate squares at about £6.99. The listed pack weighs 98 g, making it notably lighter and thinner than the brand's 10 cm, 15 mm set. Its 4.2 rating and 3,042-review text are the same as the larger ASIN, so they do not provide separate evidence for this size. Shared reviews include a report of washing-machine feet wearing through the pad material. The lower 10 mm lift may suit a tighter gap, but neither hardness nor a tested load limit is stated.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A small appliance or a washer with broad feet where only 10 mm of added height is acceptable.
Less suitable: Concentrated heavy feet, or anyone wanting independent reviews for this exact size.
Specifications
Common questions
How is this set different from the other LouMaxx pack?
This listing is model 10164, titled 9 × 9 × 1.0 cm, at 98 g and about £6.99. The other is model 10113, titled 10 × 10 × 1.5 cm, at 460 g and about £7.99.
Are the reviews separate?
The first 50 UK review bodies in the raw file are the same text as B0897KDN6S.
Where are they made, according to the listing?
The title and bullets say Germany, in rubber granulate.
The FUX set places a 90 × 90 × 15 mm recycled-rubber square beneath each appliance foot. At about £6.49 for four, it is the lowest-priced established rubber set in this comparison and has 4.2 from 375 amazon.co.uk reviews. Buyers report useful results at a 1,400 rpm washer spin in some installations. However, one reviewer found the pads did not stop a wandering washing machine at all. The 15 mm lift also needs checking against the available worktop gap before fitting.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A level washer, dryer or small appliance that needs four inexpensive rubber support points.
Less suitable: A machine with severe walking, or a fitted appliance without 15 mm of spare height.
Specifications
Common questions
What size are the FUX pads?
The title states 90 × 90 × 15 mm, in a pack of four.
Are they recycled rubber?
The bullet says 100 percent recycled rubber granules, made in Germany.
Does the listing say they can be cut?
Yes. The bullet says they are customisable and can be cut to fit.
The Navani set provides four round rubber pads intended for a washing machine or dryer. Its amazon.co.uk line is 4.2 from 302 reviews at about £6.99, and some buyers say the pads stopped a machine walking. The outcome is inconsistent, because another reviewer reported worse jumping and noise after fitting them. The listing does not state the diameter, thickness or installation detail, which makes clearance and foot fit difficult to judge before ordering. This is therefore a low-cost option with a meaningful evidence gap rather than a predictable fit.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A shopper prepared to try a simple round rubber set where exact dimensions are not critical.
Less suitable: A tight appliance bay, an unusual foot size, or a washer that already jumps severely.
Specifications
Common questions
How many pads are in the pack?
The listing says four pieces.
What shape are they?
The listing says round, black, rubber.
Does the listing give a size?
No thickness or diameter is in the specification block.
The Zestecho pack supplies four textured black rubber squares intended to sit beneath washing-machine feet. Its rating is 3.6 from ten amazon.co.uk reviews at about £7.39, a weaker and thinner evidence base than the leading rubber sets. One buyer says bouncing stopped but the machine then slid on a smooth floor, while another reports that walking on LVT was reduced rather than stopped. The listed 10 × 30 × 50 mm dimensions do not describe a square and should not be used for fit planning. These pads may change the machine's movement, but the supplied reviews do not support a reliable anti-slip result.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A cautious low-cost trial beneath a level washer where movement can be checked during a test spin.
Less suitable: Smooth floors where sliding is already the main problem, or anyone needing reliable dimensions.
Specifications
Common questions
What does the listing say they are made of?
Rubber. The shape field says square and the colour is black.
Is a reliable size given?
The dimension line reads 10 × 30 × 50 mm, which is not a square. Treat it as an unclean spec.
What did reviewers say about slippery floors?
One UK review says bouncing stopped and the machine then slid. Another says walking on LVT was only reduced.
The PrecisionGeek product is a set of self-adhesive stainless-steel spikes and pads for speakers, stands and subwoofers. Each listed unit is 2 × 2 × 0.7 cm, and no threaded insert is required. Its hard spike arrangement serves a different purpose from a resilient rubber washing-machine pad, so it should not be chosen for a domestic appliance. The supplied amazon.co.uk file contains no star rating or review count to judge user outcomes. At about £16.80, it is also one of the more expensive items in this mixed search shelf.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A speaker, stand or subwoofer that specifically needs adhesive metal spikes.
Less suitable: Washing machines, dryers or anyone seeking a soft vibration-isolation layer.
Specifications
Common questions
Do these need a threaded insert?
The bullet says the mount is self-adhesive and no thread is required.
What are they for?
The title says hi-fi speakers, stands, and subwoofers.
Is there a star rating?
The raw file has no customer-review line.
The TopHomer set provides four rubber feet with M8 threads for compressors, pumps, welders and gym machines. Unlike a loose pad, each foot screws into the machine base, so compatibility depends on an existing M8 mounting point. The set weighs 340 g and costs about £11.19, but the supplied amazon.co.uk file has no star rating or customer-review line. HSE guidance warns that a fixing which bypasses a resilient mount can reduce isolation, so the machine's intended mounting arrangement matters. These are workshop replacement feet, not a shortcut for placing rubber beneath a washing machine.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A compressor, pump, welder or gym machine designed to accept M8 rubber feet.
Less suitable: A washing machine, a machine without M8 mounts, or a buyer wanting tool-free fitting.
Specifications
Common questions
What thread do they use?
The title says M8.
How are they attached?
The bullet says screws anchor the foot to the compressor base. They are not a loose mat.
Is there a star rating?
The raw file has no customer-review line.
Shelf prices, stars, and review counts are the amazon.co.uk figures for these 12 listings. The editorial score is a 0–100 figure for this set. It is damped when the review count is tiny or shared with another size, and it keeps listing conflicts and owner-reported faults. Price decides the best-value badge, not the score. This is not a laboratory vibration test, not a decibel measurement, and not a Shore hardness result. No listing here publishes those figures.
Stars and review count
30%Amazon stars are the starting point, then the count is damped. One review, or the same LouMaxx review block on two sizes, does not count as a large independent sample.
Form and material
25%A rubber sheet, rubber foot squares, a polypropylene cup, an M8 compressor foot, and speaker spikes are scored as different jobs. A plastic riser is not treated as a rubber isolator.
Size and listing clarity
25%Thickness, footprint, and a specification that agrees with the title score higher. A missing diameter, a 35 cm cube on a foot cup, or a size line that is not a square costs points.
Reported faults
20%UK review faults stay in the score: a washer that still walked, feet that wore through, a cup that did not fit, or a pad a compressor foot indented.
Name the job before you compare a price. A washer foot, a 600 mm sheet, an air-conditioner or treadmill pad, an M8 compressor foot, and a speaker spike are different products. Take the transit bolts out and level the feet first. Then match thickness to the foot and the worktop gap, and use a review count that belongs to that ASIN. None of these 12 listings states Shore hardness or a tested decibel cut.
Anti-vibration pads on amazon.co.uk mix rubber squares, a full sheet, plastic foot cups, threaded compressor feet, and speaker spikes under one name. You are usually trying to stop a washer or dryer walking or drumming through a timber floor, after the transit bolts are out and the feet are level. Judge form and material first, then thickness against the foot and the worktop gap, then whether the review count belongs to that ASIN.
LG, Samsung, Bosch, and Electrolux UK all tell you to remove the transit bolts and level the feet first. Electrolux then mentions covers under the feet. A pad on a machine that is still bolted for transport, or standing on uneven feet, does not answer the job these listings are sold for.
A rubber sheet, four rubber squares, a polypropylene cup, an M8 compressor foot, and adhesive speaker spikes are different products. A plastic riser can stop sliding and add height. It is not the same job as a rubber isolator. Four tiny cubes will not carry a washer.
The two LouMaxx sizes share one 3,042-review block. Xindojuz and BeoTnp are 5.0 from one review, and BeoTnp's review is foam under a soundbar. Do not quote seller cuts of 60–80%. These listings do not publish a measured reduction, and the LouMaxx PAK-free line is uncertified.
Name the job before the price. A washer foot, a 600 mm sheet, an air-conditioner or treadmill pad, an M8 compressor foot, and a speaker spike are different products. The Loxley sheet is one 60 × 60 cm recycled-rubber mat. FUX, both LouMaxx packs, Zestecho, and Xindojuz are loose squares. Navani is four round pads with no diameter stated. YuhooTech is polypropylene and TPU cups. YMTGOD is a ribbed rubber-and-EVA pad aimed at compressors and treadmills. TopHomer screws in on an M8 thread.
Match area and thickness to the foot and the gap. FUX adds 15 mm on a 90 × 90 mm square. The thicker LouMaxx title is 15 mm on 10 × 10 cm, and its specification also says 20 × 20 cm. The thinner LouMaxx title is 10 mm on 9 × 9 cm at 98 g. Loxley is 8 mm across 60 × 60 cm. The YMTGOD specification is 22 mm. Xindojuz is 50 × 50 × 10 mm at 20 g for the pack. BeoTnp is a 10 × 10 × 10 mm block. Bosch suggests a water-resistant board at least 30 mm thick on a poor timber floor.
Three typical situations, each with a recommendation from this comparison.
You want less drumming through a timber floor, and a full sheet will fit under the appliance. The Loxley Benedict 60 cm mat is the top pick for that job. Skip it if the worktop gap will not take the sheet, and do not expect silence.
You have already removed the transit bolts and levelled the feet, and you want four rubber squares at a low shelf price. The FUX 15 mm pack is the best value. Check you have 15 mm of spare height, and do not expect every wandering washer to stop.
You are fitting a compressor, pump, welder, or gym machine that already has M8 mounts, not a washer. The TopHomer feet screw to that base. A loose washer square is the wrong part, and this listing has no star line.
The top pick is the Loxley Benedict 60 × 60 cm recycled-rubber sheet, 8 mm and 2 kg, at about £27.99, with 4.3 from 223 amazon.co.uk reviews. It covers the appliance area on a timber floor when the mat will fit. It costs more than the foot sets, it may not slide under a fitted worktop, and the listing disagrees on a five-year and a two-year guarantee. The best value is the FUX pack of four 90 × 90 × 15 mm squares at about £6.49, with 4.2 from 375 reviews. Some reviews report a change at 1,400 rpm, and one reviewer found that a wandering washer was not stopped. Speaker spikes, M8 compressor feet, and a one-review block are different products and sit lower in this set.
FUX 90 × 90 × 15 mm, pack of 4
Four 90 × 90 × 15 mm recycled-rubber squares at about £6.49, with 4.2 from 375 reviews. A wandering washer was not stopped in one review, and 15 mm of height has to fit.
Editorial
Peter F. is the editor for DIY & tools at productscompared.co.uk. Comparisons in this category are checked against amazon.co.uk listings, review evidence and public UK sources.
Guides on what to look for, how to use a product, and common mistakes.
Public UK sources for isolation, appliance setup, and noise-nuisance context. Listings checked 17 October 2026. Prices on amazon.co.uk move.
This page contains affiliate links to amazon.co.uk. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Prices, stars, and review counts come from those listings. We did not run a vibration test. The scores rank a listing inside this set only.
