Independent comparisons. We may earn from shop links. More info

Best USB wall socket

Updated: October 2026

You want one white British General plate for a bedside or a kitchen worktop, and the 4.7-star listing is the one with no USB-C port. The best USB wall socket in this set is the plate whose ports and watts match the device you actually charge, not the plate with the highest stars. Prices and review themes are in the [USB socket comparison](/hub/sockets-and-extension-leads/usb-socket). The four listings are the £8.86 USB-A plate, two 15 W plates with one USB-C port, and a £20 plate with two USB-C ports. Updated 16 October 2026. We did not run a lab test.

You want one white British General plate for a bedside or a kitchen worktop, and the 4.7-star listing is the one with no USB-C port.

Our top picks

On this page

Best if you only have USB-A cables

The £8.86 plate, model 922UAA12-01, is the one to buy when every lead is still USB-A and you charge one phone at a time. It is a Nexus 900 square double with two USB-A ports and a stated 12 W share. amazon.co.uk shows 4.7 from 343 ratings, the highest star line here. Reviewers praise the plastic and a tidy fit. A bullet says it fits a 25 mm box. Skip it if you want a USB-C hole. There is no PD or QC line, and the listing does not print BS 1363. Two recent phones left overnight were still low. Why 3120 W is the mains attribute is on the USB wall socket buying guide.

Best everyday USB-C on a budget

The round-edge Nexus 800, model 822UAAC15-01, is £12.99 with 4.6 from 378 ratings. The square-edge Nexus 900, model 922UAAC15-01, is £15.99 with 4.6 from 777 ratings. Both list two USB-A ports and one USB-C port at 15 W, with no PD or QC line. The round plate is £3 less, which is why it is the best value. The square plate is the top pick if you want the larger sample. On the round plate, one report says a hum started after a few months and stopped only when a USB device was plugged in. On the square plate, a laptop on USB-C would not finish, and one face cracked when it was tightened on plastic dado trunking. Neither listing states a box depth or BS 1363. A laptop still wants its own charger.

Best spec in this set

The £20 plate, model 822UACC30-01, is a Nexus 800 round-edge double with one USB-A port, two USB-C ports, a stated 30 W output, and PD and QC named in the bullets. It is the only listing that prints Specification Met: BS 1363, and it states a 25 mm minimum box. Stars are 4.5 from 209 ratings. One Motorola owner reported TurboPower-style phone charging. One of two plates lost a USB-C port after about six months while the other ran extremely hot and the faceplate cracked. Another buyer said the USB-C ports stopped after about a month. Two USB-C devices slowed each other, and a Nikon ZF battery would not charge. There is no IP rating. If you still want this plate, measure first on the USB socket back box depth page.

When none of them is the best buy

None of these plates is the best buy for a laptop, a shallow box, or a connector you expect to change again. The highest USB claim is 30 W, shared. A plug-in charger uses one 13 A outlet and can be replaced when USB moves on, which is the point of USB socket vs plug charger. Use the £8.86 plate for USB-A only. Use the £12.99 round plate for USB-C at the lower 15 W price. Use the £15.99 square plate for the 777-rating sample. Use the £20 plate for two USB-C ports and a printed BS 1363 line. If the box will not close, or the room is a bathroom, none of the four is the next step.

Common questions

Which of these four should I buy for phones?
For one USB-A phone, the £8.86 plate is the match. For a USB-C phone, the £12.99 round plate is the best value and the £15.99 square plate is the top pick on review volume. The £20 plate suits two USB-C phones if you accept ports that stopped within months. None is a laptop charger.
Why not the one with 4.7 stars?
Because that plate has no USB-C port and a stated 12 W share. The 4.7 from 343 ratings sits on model 922UAA12-01. Two recent phones were still low after a night. Stars track a tidy swap, not charging speed.
Square 15 W or round 15 W?
Both are 15 W with two USB-A ports and one USB-C, and neither names PD. The round plate is £12.99, 4.6 from 378 ratings, with one hum report. The square plate is £15.99, 4.6 from 777 ratings, with a laptop that would not finish. Choose the edge that matches the room, then the price.
Is the £20 plate the fast one?
It is the only plate here that claims 30 W, PD, and QC. British General says 50% in 30 minutes. That is their claim. Reviewers still report slower charging with both USB-C ports in use, and a camera that would not charge.
Can any of them charge a laptop properly?
Not on these reviews. The square 15 W USB-C port did not finish a laptop charge. Keep the laptop’s own charger in a 13 A socket.
Which one actually prints BS 1363?
Only the £20 plate, B0DN255MB4, prints Specification Met: BS 1363. The other three do not. A printed line is not a bathroom rating. None of the four states an IP rating.
Do I need a deeper box for the 30 W plate?
The listing says a minimum of 25 mm, and reviewers still describe a crowded back. BuildWiz allows 35 mm when the cables are already in the box. If the face will not sit flush, do not keep tightening it.

Related pages

Sources

Public UK sources on BS 1363, Part P, bathrooms, and back-box depth. amazon.co.uk listings for B0D2F4MZXK, B0D2DVZY8H, B0D2DX8RN9, and B0DN255MB4 checked 16 October 2026. Prices move.

  1. BSI Knowledge, changes to the BS 1363 series (retrieved 16 October 2026)
  2. GOV.UK, replacements and repairs to your home (retrieved 16 October 2026)
  3. Welsh Government, building regulations: electrics (retrieved 16 October 2026)
  4. IET, Part P frequently asked questions (retrieved 16 October 2026)
  5. IET, Part P in Scotland and Northern Ireland (retrieved 16 October 2026)
  6. Electrical Safety First, bathrooms (retrieved 16 October 2026)
  7. BG Electrical, USB charging socket example (retrieved 16 October 2026)
  8. BuildWiz, USB socket (retrieved 16 October 2026)
  9. Communities NI, electrical safety standards for private tenancies 2024 (retrieved 16 October 2026)