The best Solar pool covers, compared.
Top pick: tillvex 549 x 274 cm solar film – Highest score: 549 x 274 cm at 120 micron, a size you can cut, and 4.4 from 40 reviews at £56.79, with no UK review text in the saved notes. Best value: Intex 28010 Easy Set solar cover – Best value at £12.99: 120 micron for a named 244 cm Easy Set, 4.1 from 173 reviews, if you accept a film that sits inside the waterline. Updated October 2026.
A solar pool cover here is a bubble film that floats on the water, bubbles down, to slow heat loss from evaporation. You fit one to an, a frame pool, or a rectangle you will trim. Trust a listing whose cover size agrees with the bullets, and whose material is polyethylene bubble film. Bestway's rectangle title prints the pool lengths, while the size field is 380 x 180 cm. The checks for size fields are in the solar pool cover buying guide. It is not a winter sheet, and it is not a cover that holds a person. Describes evaporation as the job of this product type.
A solar pool cover here is a bubble film that floats on the water, bubbles down, to slow heat loss from evaporation. You fit one to an, a frame pool, or a rectangle you will trim.
25 products checked · 58 hrs invested · +18,600 readers
Swipe for more
1-2 of 7
Personal buying guide
Question 1 of 2
What shape is the pool?
The tillvex film is a 549 x 274 cm bubble-air polyethylene sheet at £56.79, with the thickness stated as 120 micron, and the bullets say you cut it for a round or a rectangular pool with the knotted face on the water. The amazon.co.uk average is 4.4 from 40 reviews, and none of the reviews in the saved notes is marked as written in the United Kingdom, so that star line is not a British-only sample. Notes from other marketplaces describe a usable sheet once it is cut, including use at night and to keep debris off the water, and one reviewer was satisfied that the dimensions were right. Those notes are not UK opinion. The same notes say it has to be trimmed, and one calls it expensive next to packing wrap. A seller line about cost savings of around 70 percent is not a test in the saved notes. The model-name field says Thermal Pool Towel, and there is no reel or bag in the bullets. In this set it is the top pick when you want one large sheet with a stated micron and you will cut it to the pool, and it is the wrong buy if you need UK review text or a film that fits without scissors.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A round or rectangular pool you will trim a 5.49 m by 2.74 m, 120 micron sheet to fit.
Less suitable: A buyer who wants UK review text, a film that fits with no cutting, or a cover under £15.
Specifications
Common questions
Can you cut it?
The bullets say the film can be cut for a circular or a rectangular pool. Reviews from outside the UK also say it has to be cut.
Are the 40 reviews from the UK?
The listing average is 4.4 from 40. No review in the saved notes is marked Reviewed in the United Kingdom.
Does the listing answer the chlorine question?
The listing asks if it works with chlorine. The bullets do not answer. They do say store it dry, ventilated, and out of direct sun.
The Intex 28010 is a round polyethylene film at £12.99, listed for a 244 cm Easy Set, with the cover itself stated at about 206 cm and 120 micron. Across 173 amazon.co.uk reviews the average is 4.1, and UK notes in the saved reviews say the water felt warmer, including one report of about 4 to 6 degrees in the sun, and that the sheet floats. Reviewers also call it easy to use and worth having as well as a separate cover, including one who put it on a hot tub. It does not cover the whole pool: those UK notes say it was not quite the full 8 ft. One reviewer thought it looked like bubble wrap on opening, and another expected to have to cut it. The closure field says zipper, but the bullets do not describe a zip, and there is no storage bag in the box. In this set it is the best value when your pool is that 244 cm Easy Set and you accept a film that sits inside the waterline. It is a weak match if you need the sheet to reach the wall.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A 244 cm Intex Easy Set, or a small round pool or hot tub, where a film inside the waterline is enough.
Less suitable: A pool that needs the sheet to reach the wall, or a buyer who wants a zip and a storage bag in the box.
Specifications
Common questions
Which pool is the 28010 listed for?
The bullets say an Easy Set pool with a diameter of 244 cm. The product diameter in the same bullets is 206 cm.
Does the listing say it floats?
The installation field says floating. One UK review says it floats on the water.
Is a storage bag included?
A storage bag is only a listing question. The bullets do not include one. The care line says clean with water and mild soap, then dry in a cool dry place.
The Bestway 58253 is a round film at £30.49, with the size field at 462 cm for Bestway 4.57 m and 4.88 m round frame and steel-wall pools, including Steel Pro Max and Power Steel. The listing weight is 1.44 kg, heavier than the rectangular 58240 at 620 g in this set, and the average is 3.7 from 119 reviews. Only three of the reviews in the saved notes are from the UK. One says it keeps insects and leaves out and heats the pool, and the others call the fit good, one of them excellent, and the price fair. The limit in that small set is the material: one reviewer wanted a heavier bubble sheet, and the listing states no thickness. The material field prints both polyethylene and PVC, so this page does not tell you which polymer is in the parcel. The bullets do not say you can trim it, although a listing question asks. It suits a Bestway round pool in that 4.57 m to 4.88 m pair when 462 cm is the cover you measured for, and it is a weak choice if you needed a stated micron or more than three UK reviews.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A Bestway Steel Pro Max or Power Steel round pool of 4.57 m or 4.88 m, when 462 cm is the cover diameter you want.
Less suitable: A buyer who needs a stated micron, or a UK review sample larger than the three texts in the saved notes.
Specifications
Common questions
Which pools do the bullets name?
Bestway 4.57 m (15 ft) and 4.88 m (16 ft) round frame pools and round steel-wall pools. The included-components line names Steel Pro Max and Power Steel.
Is 4.88 m the cover diameter?
The size field says 462 cm. The title's 4.57 m and 4.88 m match the pools in the bullets.
How many UK reviews are in the saved notes?
Three. They mention heat, leaves, a good fit, and a wish for heavier bubble material. The 3.7 from 119 is the listing average.
The Bestway 58240 is a blue polyethylene sheet at £25.67, and the size field is 380 x 180 cm. That is the cover: the 4.04 m and 4.12 m figures in the title are the pool lengths in the bullets, not a 4 m by 4 m sheet. The listing average is 3.6 from 398 reviews. UK notes say the water stayed warmer for some people, including one hot-summer line that it felt like a bath, and that the film is easy to cut so the fit can be all right afterwards. The same notes are full of the size complaint: the title reads like a cover just over 4 m by 4 m, the sheet is about 1.8 m by 3.8 m, and buyers who sized a pool of about 4 m by 3 m from the title say it does not fit. Reviewers call it thin bubble wrap, some say it did not warm the pool, and one says there are not enough ties and none on the corners. No thickness is stated. Measure the water and treat 380 x 180 cm as the sheet before you order; it is a poor order if you need a cover that actually spans about 4 m by 4 m.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A Bestway rectangular frame pool about 4.0 m by 2.0 m, once you treat 380 x 180 cm as the sheet and you are willing to cut it.
Less suitable: Anyone who reads the title as a cover of about 4 m by 4 m, including a pool around 4 m by 3 m.
Specifications
Common questions
Is the title the size of the cover?
The title says 4.04 m x 4.12 m. The size field says 380 x 180 cm. The bullets use 4.04 m x 2.01 m and 4.12 m x 2.01 m as the pools.
What is the closure?
The closure field says drawstring. The bullets do not list ties. One UK review says there are not enough ties and none on the corners.
Does the listing state a thickness?
No micron figure is stated. The material field says polyethylene.
The Walopola listing is £9.05, and the title says a 10 ft round blue solar cover, while the size field says 39 cm and the dimensions are 38.7 cm by 29.8 cm. The average is 3.5 from 7 reviews, five of them UK texts in the saved notes. Short UK lines say it is great and that it fits, and one review calls it thick, UV-resistant, a good fit on a round pool, and easy to put on and take off. Another UK review measured about 9 ft, says the pictures showed 270 cm, and calls the quality really bad, and a further review says the size is not correct. The bullets call it a bubble cover with a no-tools setup, but they do not name a material, a thickness, or any anchors. The colour field says Multicolor against a blue title, and the weight is 240 g. At this price it is only worth opening if you can measure the sheet on arrival and send it back when it is not the 10 ft you ordered. It is a poor choice if the pool has to be covered straight away and you cannot risk the size.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A round pool near 9 to 10 ft only if you can measure the sheet on arrival and return it when the size is wrong.
Less suitable: A pool that has to be covered to a stated 10 ft with no chance of a return, or a buyer who treats the 39 cm field as the cover.
Specifications
Common questions
Is it 10 ft?
The title says 10 ft. The size field says 39 cm and the dimensions are 38.7 cm x 29.8 cm. One UK review says it is about 9 ft and that pictures said 270 cm.
Are straps included?
The listing asks. The bullets do not list anchors or straps. They do say a no-tools setup.
What is the material field?
There is no material-type line. The bullets call it a bubble pool cover. Colour is multicolor in the field and blue in the title.
The KMQRDZi listing at £26.99 uses model 1225 and a title of 300 x 200 cm, while the size field and the item dimensions say 220 x 150 cm. The average is 3.3 from 23 reviews, and six UK reviews are in the saved notes. One calls it a decent basic cover and says the material feels sturdy enough, and a short line says it is acceptable for the money. The other UK notes describe thin, lightweight bubble wrap, a buyer who expected a heavier cover, one pool it did not fit, and trouble keeping bugs off an inflatable. A line in the bullets about heating costs falling by up to 70 percent is the seller's claim, not a test in the saved notes. This ASIN shares its image URL and model number with the 260 x 170 cm listing, which is filed at 100 g against 480 g here. The bullets say you can cut it, or buy another sheet if the pool is larger, but you should not order until you know which of the two sizes will arrive. It is a poor fit if you wanted a named-pool cover with a thickness you can read.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A small rectangular pool only after you confirm which size is in the parcel and you are content to cut bubble film.
Less suitable: A named Intex or Bestway pool, or anyone who needs the title size and the size field to match.
Specifications
Common questions
Which size should you trust?
The title says 300 x 200 cm. The size field says 220 x 150 cm and the dimensions are 2.2 m x 1.5 m. The listing does not resolve that.
Can it be cut?
The bullets say yes, and that you can buy more than one sheet if the pool is larger.
What do the UK reviews say about the material?
They call it thin bubble wrap. One says it did not fit. One says it was acceptable for a basic cover. The seller line about a 70 percent heating-cost cut is not a test in the saved notes.
This KMQRDZi sheet is £20.99, model 1225 again, with a title and a size field of 260 x 170 cm and a dimensions field of 2.2 m x 1.5 m. The material field says polyethylene bubble wrap, and the weight field says 100 g. The average is 2.9 from 17 reviews. Four UK reviews are in the saved notes, and none of them praises it: they call it expensive blue bubble wrap, say the pictures suggest a more substantial cover, and one says it was smaller than advertised and was returned. The bullets say you can cut it and lay it on the pool, and they repeat a seller line that heating costs can fall by up to 70 percent, which is not a measurement here. It shares the photograph and the model number with the £26.99 listing. Order it only if bubble film at this price is what you meant to buy and you can return a short sheet. It is the wrong listing if you need cover sizes that agree, or UK notes that describe warmer water.
Pros
Cons
Best for: A buyer who wants bubble film at £20.99, can check 260 x 170 cm against 2.2 m x 1.5 m, and can return a short sheet.
Less suitable: Anyone who read the pictures as a heavy pool cover, or who needs UK reviews that describe warmer water.
Specifications
Common questions
Why are there two KMQRDZi films?
B0D2L2VCNZ is the 260 x 170 cm title at £20.99. B0D2L2X4RJ is the 300 x 200 cm title at £26.99. Both use model 1225 and the same image URL.
What size is in the dimensions field?
2.2 m x 1.5 m, which is 220 x 150 cm, not 260 x 170 cm. The weight field says 100 g.
What do the UK reviews say?
Four UK reviews call it blue bubble wrap. One says it was smaller than advertised and was returned. No UK review in the saved notes praises it.
Seven amazon.co.uk listings were scored from 0 to 100. The weights are the star line and review count (35), a specification you can order (30), review notes (20), and the GBP shelf price (15). There is no laboratory test. A solar film is scored as a floating sheet, not as a safety cover. The top pick is the highest total, once. Best value is the Intex 28010, once. The lowest sticker, Walopola at £9.05, does not take that badge: the size field is 39 cm against a 10 ft title, and the star line is 3.5 from 7 reviews.
Amazon line
35%Stars and review count on amazon.co.uk for that ASIN. A large count can outweigh a middling star line. A count under 10 cannot carry this block.
Specification you can order
30%A cover size that agrees with itself, a stated thickness, a named pool, and a material. Points come off when the title prints the pool instead of the sheet, or when two sizes share one ASIN.
Review notes
20%UK texts that describe warmer water or a fit you can use. A thin film, a sheet that leaves the water uncovered, and a return for size come off. Notes from other Amazon marketplaces are not treated as British opinion.
Shelf price
15%The GBP figure on amazon.co.uk. The cheapest listing can lead this block and still miss best value when you cannot order a size from the page.
Choose the sheet that matches the water, not the biggest number in the title. A bubble film for a 244 cm Easy Set, a Bestway frame pool, and a rectangle you will trim are different orders. On amazon.co.uk the seven listings here run from £9.05 to £56.79. Quality is a size field that agrees with the title, a material that is polyethylene bubble film, and a thickness when the listing states one. A 4.4 from 40 reviews with no UK text is a different record from 4.1 from 173.
A solar pool cover in this comparison is a bubble film that floats on the water, bubbles down and smooth side up, to slow heat loss from evaporation. You fit one to an Intex Easy Set, a Bestway frame pool, or a rectangle you will trim. It is not a winter sheet, and it is not a cover that holds a person. SPATA describes evaporation as the job of this product type.
A PE cloth or 420D Oxford tarp with eyelets is a debris cover, even if the title says solar. Bubble film that floats is the product on this page. Debris sheets stay with the other cover comparisons. Do not expect a tied winter sheet to behave like 120 micron film.
Bestway 58240's title leads with 4.04 m and 4.12 m. Those are pool lengths. The size field is 380 x 180 cm. Intex prints 206 cm of film for a 244 cm pool. Walopola's title says 10 ft and the size field says 39 cm. Read the field before you order.
Intex and tillvex state 120 micron. SPATA calls 400 micron the popular specialist grade, and that grade is not these listings. A seller line about a 70 percent cut in heating costs is not a test of these films. One reviewer's 4 to 6 degrees is not a guarantee.
The number that matters is the sheet on the water, not the largest figure in the title. Intex 28010 prints about 206 cm of film for a 244 cm Easy Set, and UK notes say it does not cover the whole pool. Bestway 58240's size field is 380 x 180 cm for pools about 4.04 m or 4.12 m by 2.01 m. The title's 4.04 m x 4.12 m is two pool lengths, not a square cover. Bestway 58253's size field is 462 cm for 4.57 m and 4.88 m round pools. Those pool diameters are not the sheet.
Where a listing states a thickness, Intex 28010 and the tillvex sheet both say 120 micron. SPATA calls 400 micron the popular specialist grade. That grade is not these ASINs, and a GeoBubble from about £140 at a UK shop is a different product. Bestway 58240, Bestway 58253, both KMQRDZi listings and Walopola do not state a micron. Do not treat a missing figure as 400 micron. Material should be polyethylene bubble film.
Three typical situations, each with a recommendation from this comparison.
You want the film Intex sizes for a 244 cm Easy Set, and you will read the cover measurement rather than the pool diameter. The Intex 28010 at £12.99 states 120 micron and about 206 cm of film, with 4.1 from 173 reviews. UK notes say the water felt warmer and that the sheet does not cover the whole pool.
The pool is an odd rectangle or a large round, and you need one size line you can trust. The tillvex sheet is 549 x 274 cm at 120 micron and £56.79, and the bullets say you can cut it. The amazon.co.uk line is 4.4 from 40 reviews, and none of those reviews is marked United Kingdom.
The pool is a Bestway Steel Pro Max or Power Steel of 4.57 m or 4.88 m, and 462 cm is the cover diameter you measured for. Bestway 58253 is £30.49, with 3.7 from 119 reviews and a listed weight of 1.44 kg. The listing states no thickness, and only three of the saved reviews are from the UK.
The top pick is the tillvex sheet at £56.79. It is the highest total: 549 x 274 cm at 120 micron, bullets that say you can cut it, and 4.4 from 40 amazon.co.uk reviews. No review in the saved notes is marked United Kingdom, and it is the dearest price in the set. The best value is the Intex 28010 at £12.99, for a 244 cm Easy Set, with 120 micron stated and 4.1 from 173 reviews. The cover itself is about 206 cm, and UK notes say it does not reach the wall. None of these scores is a temperature test, and none of these films is a safety cover.
tillvex 549 x 274 cm solar film
Highest score: 549 x 274 cm at 120 micron, a size you can cut, and 4.4 from 40 reviews at £56.79, with no UK review text in the saved notes.
Intex 28010 Easy Set solar cover
Best value at £12.99: 120 micron for a named 244 cm Easy Set, 4.1 from 173 reviews, if you accept a film that sits inside the waterline.
Editorial
Peter F. is the editor for DIY & tools at productscompared.co.uk. Comparisons in this category are checked against amazon.co.uk listings, review evidence and public UK sources.
Guides on what to look for, how to use a product, and common mistakes.
Public UK sources used for this comparison. Listing prices, stars and review counts are the amazon.co.uk figures saved for this set on 20 October 2026.
This page contains affiliate links to amazon.co.uk. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Prices, stars and review counts are the UK listing lines saved on 20 October 2026. We did not run a lab test.
