Independent comparisons. We may earn from shop links. More info

Best Puma safety shoes in this amazon.co.uk set

Updated: 21 October 2026

You are choosing among seven kept Puma listings on amazon.co.uk. The best Puma safety shoes in this shortlist depend on the code your workplace already wrote down. If that code is S3, one mid shoe is the top pick and the best value at the same time. If the rule is only a high boot for rain, a different card leads, and it still does not print S3. The [Puma safety shoes comparison](/hub/occupational-safety/puma-safety-shoes) is the seven-card table. This page says who each listing is for, and who should leave it. A qualifying purchase can earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. Peter F. compared these amazon.co.uk listings and their review notes and did not lab-test the shoes.

You are choosing among seven kept Puma listings on amazon.co.uk. The best Puma safety shoes in this shortlist depend on the code your workplace already wrote down.

Our top picks

Puma PUMA Safety Conquest CTX High EH WP

Best overall

Puma PUMA Safety Conquest CTX High EH WP
9.2/10about £82.99
View offer
Puma PUMA Safety Rio MID S3L

Alternative

Puma PUMA Safety Rio MID S3L
8.6/10about £75.91
View offer
Puma PUMA Safety Rio Black Mid S3 SRC

Best value

Puma PUMA Safety Rio Black Mid S3 SRC
8.4/10about £68.08
View offer
On this page
  1. 1.If the job needs the letters on the title
  2. 2.If the job is rain and a high boot
  3. 3.The two same-model Conquests and the low shoes
  4. 4.Who should skip the shortlist

If the job needs the letters on the title

The PUMA Safety Rio Black Mid S3 SRC at £68.08 is the only kept title that prints S3, SRC, an aluminium toe cap, and anti-puncture together. It has 4.2 from 694 reviews. Some buyers would go a size down. The title does not say waterproof. When the assessment asks for S3 on the product you buy, this is the top pick in the set. It is also the best value, because it is the cheaper of the two Rio cards and the only one with that fuller title string. The twin, the PUMA Safety Rio MID S3L at £75.91, shares model number 23091-37916 and has 4.3 from 292 reviews. What S3L adds is on S3 or S1P safety shoes.

If the job is rain and a high boot

The PUMA Safety Conquest CTX High EH WP at £82.99 has 4.6 from 597 reviews, the strongest star line in this file. The title prints EH and WP, not an S-code. UK reviews describe dry feet in rain, including a quarry worker and an eight-hour shift, and they mention a side zip that the title does not name. Break-in of about two weeks, and heat in warm weather, come up often. Fit notes point in different directions: too big, undersized, or wide. One UK review says the toe cap is metal-free and that small metal parts can still trigger a detector. That boot is the right pointer when your rule is a high boot for rain and nobody has required an S-code on the title. If the paper says S3, go back to the Rio at £68.08.
Puma PUMA Safety Conquest CTX High EH WP

Testsieger

Puma PUMA Safety Conquest CTX High EH WP
9.2/10about £82.99
View offer

The two same-model Conquests and the low shoes

Two further Conquest listings, both titled PUMA Conquest Blk Ctx High, both £88.99, share model number 27285-46457. One has 4.1 from 168 reviews. The other has 4.1 from 48 reviews. Neither title prints an S-code or WP. UK reviews on the larger file praise a side zip and a light feel, and they call the boots waterproof even though the title does not. On the thinner file, a UK 10 was much too large for a usual 9.5. Wellington in the title is not a moulded rubber wellington. Prefer the 168-review card over the 48-review card, and prefer the CTX if you need WP printed. The low shoes print no class either. Trainer against boot is on safety trainers or safety boots.

Who should skip the shortlist

Skip the whole set when the work is chainsaw cutting, foundry or molten metal, chemical splash, or electrically insulating footwear. Skip it when occupational health has asked for a medical last. HSE's construction guidance expects a toecap and, where nails are the risk, a midsole. A title with no class does not show you that midsole. A driver or warehouse buyer can look at the Airtwist for dry indoor miles only when the workplace has not named a code. The moment the induction says S1P or S3, that 1,845-review trainer is the wrong buy. A site buyer who must show S3 on the title stays with the Rio at £68.08. Who pays stays on the Puma safety shoes buying guide.

Common questions

Which listing is the top pick if the site asks for S3?
The PUMA Safety Rio Black Mid S3 SRC at £68.08. It is the only kept title that prints S3 together with SRC, an aluminium toe cap, and anti-puncture, and it has 4.2 from 694 reviews. The higher-rated Conquest does not print S3.
Which is the best value if the title must show the code?
The same Rio, at £68.08. It is cheaper than the S3L twin at £75.91, and the twin's title does not print SRC or name the toe. Best value here means the lowest price among titles that actually state the class you need.
Is the 4.6 Conquest the top pick even though the title has no S-code?
Only when your rule is a high boot for rain and the assessment does not require an S-code. The CTX at £82.99 prints EH and WP, and UK reviews describe dry feet, a side zip, about two weeks of break-in, and heat. When the policy names S3, the 4.6 does not outrank the Rio title that prints S3.
Are the two £88.99 Conquest listings the same boot?
They share model number 27285-46457 and the same £88.99 price. One file has 4.1 from 168 reviews and the other has 4.1 from 48. Treat them as two amazon listings of one model number, not as two tested designs.
Should I skip the Frontside because the reviews are not from the UK?
Yes, if you are using reviews to judge UK fit or a UK working day. The Frontside at £91.76 has 4.1 from 60 reviews, and the texts in this file are from France and Germany. The title also states no class, and it is a single size and colour, 9.5 in Blue.
When is the Airtwist the wrong buy despite 1,845 ratings?
When the workplace has named S1P, S3, or any other code the title does not print. The Airtwist at £93.95 is a low trainer with 4.3 from 1,845 reviews, and UK buyers like the weight on long shifts. Several UK reviews also say it runs long.

Related pages

How to fit Puma safety shoes

Puma safety shoes

Puma safety shoes: what to check before your order

S3 or S1P safety shoes: what the letters mean on Puma

Safety trainers or safety boots for warehouse, van, and site

Sources

Public UK sources from the research digest, last checked on 21 October 2026. Shelf prices and star lines are the amazon.co.uk figures in the display file. The price bands are this set, not a market average.

  1. HSE: PPE overview (retrieved 21 October 2026)
  2. HSE: PPE charging FAQ (retrieved 21 October 2026)
  3. HSE: construction PPE FAQ (retrieved 21 October 2026)
  4. HSE: using the right type of PPE (retrieved 21 October 2026)
  5. GOV.UK: PPE marking in Great Britain (retrieved 21 October 2026)
  6. OPSS product recall PSD 2505-0077 (retrieved 21 October 2026)
  7. PUMA SAFETY: Airtwist Low S3S ESD (retrieved 21 October 2026)
  8. PUMA SAFETY: about the brand (retrieved 21 October 2026)